Your keyword map is right. Your calendar is three months behind it. theStacc publishes 30 scored articles a month against the plan you already have, for $99/mo — under your approval, in your voice.
Free 3-day trial · Cancel before it ends and you won’t be charged · Content on your site stays yours
Used by operators who need publishing volume, not another dashboard
ReplyDaddy
ChartMath
SEO for an established SaaS company is rarely a knowledge problem. The team already knows which clusters matter, which competitor owns which comparison query, and which long-tail pages would convert. The gap is throughput: a two-person content team with a freelance bench publishes six to ten pieces a month, and the cluster they mapped needs eighty. Everything downstream of that — the flat traffic line, the deprioritised channel, the annual "should we just do paid" conversation — follows from the arithmetic.
Which is why the honest framing of this page is a production question, not a strategy one. You do not need another audit, another cluster map, or another agency to tell you that comparison pages convert. You need the eighty pages to exist, scored, on brand, and indexed, without hiring two more writers and an editor to ride them. That is the specific job theStacc does, and it is worth being clear that it is only that job.
Two surfaces, not one. The map — your Google Business Profile, which decides whether you appear in the local pack — and the blue links, where your website pages answer the questions people type before they buy.
Google rewards pages that have been live and useful for months, and listings that stay active. That is why cadence beats intensity: publishing steadily for a year outperforms a burst of work every quarter.
You mapped the category properly. Four pillars, sixty supporting pages, a comparison set against every competitor with a G2 listing. Then you divided it by the two writers you have, the SME reviews that take nine days, and the freelancer who ghosted in April, and the plan quietly became a two-year plan.
What is galling is that you can see the ceiling and you can see the cause, and neither is a skill issue. Nobody on your team is bad at this. You are simply trying to run a publishing operation with the headcount of a small newsletter, and every quarter the backlog gets longer while your board deck asks why organic is flat.
So the channel keeps looking underperforming, which makes it harder to get headcount for it, which keeps it underperforming. Meanwhile the competitor who decided to prioritise volume over polish two years ago has 1,400 indexed pages and takes the long tail of your category by default.
And the pages you did ship — the good ones, the ones with real research in them — are sitting on page three, unsupported, because there was never a cluster underneath them.
One subscription covers the work an agency splits across a writer, a local specialist, and a social manager.
A 30-day plan generated from your product, category, and competitors, which you edit before anything is written. Then 30 articles a month against it, published to your CMS on schedule.
Draft-for-approval mode puts every piece in front of a human before it exists as a URL, with a 0–100 score across 10 SEO categories attached. Admin, Editor, and Viewer roles let the team work the queue.
LinkedIn, X, Instagram, and Facebook at $49/mo, planned and scheduled in your voice so published work does not sit undistributed.
These are the shapes of query theStacc builds your content and Google posts around — matched to the services you actually offer and the areas you actually cover.
theStacc does not sell search-volume or keyword-difficulty numbers — we don’t license a keyword database. Keywords are generated from your business and filtered for whether you can realistically win them.
WordPress, Webflow, Ghost, and more, or your own stack via API. Search Console makes the plan use your real query data rather than assumptions.
theStacc drafts your ICP, category, competitors, and tone from your site. Your marketer corrects it once, and it holds across everything written afterwards.
A 30-day calendar with titles and target queries, in front of your team before a word is drafted. Kill, edit, or regenerate anything off-strategy.
Draft-for-approval routes every article to a human with its 0–100 score attached. Or switch a project to autopilot once the voice is dialled in.
Index checks at days 2, 7, 14, and 28 per article, plus weekly organic rank tracking per keyword with full history for reporting.
Every module runs in one of three modes: full autopilot, draft-for-approval, or manual. You pick per module, and you can change it any time.
Not a strategy document. Actual published work — here is the shape of it.
Articles on your site Blog SEO
Titles are examples of the shape theStacc produces from your business — your real plan is generated from your own services and areas.
Posts on your Google profile Local SEO
Migration questions in this category almost always come down to two things: what historical data comes across, and whether your existing integrations break on the other side. Feature parity is the easier half. We put together a checklist covering both, including the fields that quietly do not map between the two systems.
SEO compounds, so anyone promising rankings in week two is guessing. Here is the honest sequence.
Connect your Google listing and, if you have one, your site. theStacc analyses the business, drafts your services and voice, and generates the first month’s plan. You approve it.
Posts begin landing on your profile every couple of days and articles publish on schedule. Reviews get replies. Your first weekly rank snapshot is recorded as the baseline.
Index checks run at days 2, 7, 14 and 28 per article, so you can see what Google took and what it ignored. Early ranking movement usually appears on long-tail terms first.
With Search Console connected, your real queries start feeding next month’s plan — the system writes toward terms you already almost rank for instead of guessing.
We do not guarantee rankings or lead volume, and we would be suspicious of anyone who does. What is guaranteed is the output cadence.
SaaS content agencies commonly quote $5,000–$15,000 a month for eight to sixteen pieces, usually on a six or twelve month agreement. An in-house writer plus an editor lands in a similar range fully loaded. Here is the honest comparison, including what theStacc does not do.
| Do it yourself | Hire an agency | theStacc | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly cost | Two salaries + freelancers | $5,000–$15,000 | $99–$167 |
| Articles a month | 6–10 at full capacity | 8–16 | 30 per project |
| Editorial approval | Your process | Their process, your notes | Draft-for-approval, Admin/Editor/Viewer |
| Brand voice | Style guide + retraining | Re-briefed on every new writer | Learned from your edits, weekly |
| Indexing proof | A manual GSC check | Rarely reported | Checks at days 2, 7, 14, 28 |
| Contract | — | 6–12 months typical | Month to month |
| Who owns the content | You | Sometimes the agency | You — it stays on your site |
Our published case studies are in solar and B2B software, backed by real Search Console exports rather than mockups — and two accounts is not a pattern, so we will not present it as one. We have not run a funded SaaS content programme long enough to show you a number you should trust, and you are exactly the buyer who would spot a fabricated one. The closest honest proof is this site: theStacc plans, writes, and publishes thestacc.com’s own blog from a domain that started at zero, and you can read it and judge the writing directly. The free 3-day trial then produces drafts against your own category before you pay anything.
What actually moves the needle for saas businesses
Related industry guides: SEO for web design agencies , SEO for consulting , SEO for digital marketing agencies , SEO for e-commerce brands , SEO for it services .
No contract, no setup fee, no per-location surprise. Cancel and everything already published on your site stays yours.
15 planned posts a month — about every two days, review replies published to Google, weekly rank tracking, 0–100 profile audit. No website needed.
See Local SEO →30 SEO articles a month, researched, scored, and published to your site. WordPress, Webflow, Ghost and more.
See Blog SEO →Blog, Local SEO, and Social together — the full bundle at 15% off the separate prices.
See full pricing →Free 3-day trial · Cancel before it ends and you won’t be charged · Content on your site stays yours
Everything above is the software — you approve the work, or let it run. If you’d rather not think about marketing again, the same engine comes with people attached.
A dedicated SEO manager owns the strategy, quality-checks what the engine produces, and reports back every month. You get the output — articles live, Google posts published, reviews answered — without opening the app. Most saas businesses who choose this are busy running the business, not learning software.
The policy targets unhelpful content produced at scale to manipulate rankings. Scale is not the violation; scale without usefulness is. So the fair question is what mechanically prevents that here, and there are four things you can inspect rather than trust. Every draft is scored 0–100 across 10 SEO categories before it becomes a URL, so thin pages are visible pre-publication. Honesty gates are enforced in code, not prompts: no invented statistics, customer counts, prices, or competitor claims. A 60-day keyword cooldown blocks the near-duplicate doorway pattern the policy actually describes. And draft-for-approval keeps a human in the loop for as long as you want one. If your standard is that nothing publishes without your editor reading it first, run it that way permanently — the mode is not a trial limitation.
Different bottleneck. The SaaS Companies page is for founder-led teams with no marketing hire and an effectively empty blog, where the job is getting to a published baseline at all. This page is for teams who already have the strategy, the style guide, and the calendar, and need throughput underneath them. Same product, different entry point — if you have nobody who owns SEO, read that one instead.
Voice is learned from your edits rather than a single upfront prompt. Every change your editor makes is distilled weekly into standing style rules for the account, so the corrections you make in week one stop being necessary by week four. Expect meaningful editing in the first fortnight — that is the training signal — and materially less after. If a piece is wrong on positioning rather than prose, fixing it in the plan stage is cheaper than rewriting the draft.
Both, and you control the mix. It generates a 30-day plan from your product, category, and competitors, and with Search Console connected it weights toward queries you already rank for on page two — the cheapest wins available. You then edit the calendar before anything is written: kill topics, add your own, reorder. What it will not give you is search volume or keyword difficulty numbers, because we license no keyword database and will not print numbers we cannot source. If your process depends on those, keep your existing research tool and feed the topics in.
You do, and that is the honest answer. theStacc cannot invent a feature, a benchmark, a price, or a customer number, so the failure mode is not fabrication — it is insufficient depth on a genuinely technical topic. Draft-for-approval plus your SME on the pieces that need one is the right configuration. In practice most teams route the top-of-funnel and comparison work through lighter review and reserve SME time for the deep technical pieces, which is where the throughput gain actually comes from.
Yes. Projects let you run separate sites or brands side by side, and roles are Admin, Editor, and Viewer — so your editor works the approval queue, your analyst gets read access for reporting, and the account stays under one owner. To be plain about the limit: theStacc is not a white-label or reseller platform. There are no custom client domains, no vendor-branding removal, and no reseller billing. If that is what you need, we are not it.
Blog SEO is $99/mo for 30 articles, Social is $49/mo across LinkedIn, X, Instagram, and Facebook, Local SEO is $49/mo and most SaaS companies should skip it. All three are $167/mo. Managed Services, where a dedicated SEO manager runs it with you, start at $749/mo. Everything is month to month. If you cancel, you keep access until the end of the paid period and every article already published stays on your site as yours — there is no licence to revoke and nothing gets pulled down.
The comparison and alternative queries in a mature software category settle around a small set of domains and become very expensive to dislodge, because ranking there is a function of accumulated topical coverage and links rather than any single excellent page. Every quarter your backlog grows is a quarter that consolidation happens without you in it. The output gap does not stay a production problem for long — it turns into a positional one, and positional problems cost a great deal more to fix.
Start the free 3-day trial and watch the first posts and articles get made for your business. Cancel before it ends and you won’t be charged.
Start for free →